I worked in the mining industry for 40 years.
I am not necessarily in favor of the new mine on Record Ridge, but reading the Rossland mom’s article makes me wonder about this e-paper’s credibility posting this article without some background checking. (Rossland mom: ‘Record Ridge magnesium mine is not a sustainable choice’ published as Opinion online on Oct. 14, and on Trail Times’ Opinion page, Oct. 17.)
Several statements in this article are very exaggerated, bordering on non-truth, and not true.
Asbestos and silica, I doubt very much that would be a problem; if it by some possibility is a problem, it is easily dealt with.
Discharge of water into a creek: There is very little runoff from that area, and any harmful discharge into the environment brings on large fines.
Causing problems with wells? That’s far out, not going to happen. Most of the wildlife mentioned is not close to the mine.
Old-growth forest? That area has been logged a few times, and I am sure ferns and grass have plenty of area, and the mine takes minimal space.
These are just a few cheap shots in the Rossland mom’s article.
If people would educate themselves with facts to come to a conclusion, it would be a better world.
There are too many armchair experts in the world.
In reality, the environmental impact will be minimal and inspected by the Ministry of Mines to ensure that it is within regulations.
When the mine is shut down, it will be rehabbed into as good, if not better, than it is now. The mining company will have a bond posted for that. I have seen that done in many places.
As far as the effect on the community, it is out of the way; most people won’t even know it is there.
It will bring good-paying jobs for our young people and help businesses thrive.
A better economy will most likely help the local hospital and other community facilities.
Cliff French,
Castlegar